Environmental ethics based on Hans Jonas' principle of responsibility

Main Article Content

Andrés Felipe Sanmartín Sanmartín
Luis Fernando Garcés Giraldo
Conrado de Jesús Giraldo Zuluaga
Eduar Antonio Rodríguez Flores

Abstract

The principle of responsibility presented by Hasn Jonas is a proposal that seeks to raise awareness about the way in which a technological era has been consolidated, which threatens the natural order as we know it today and which is contextualized in the use and abuse that directly impact natural resources. but also that they generate difficulties for the human being himself, which affect his health and, therefore, the quality of life in conditions of dignity for all, since life on the planet is alternating thanks to the boom in technical and scientific development in modernity. In this sense, the proposal that allows this social situation to be solved is oriented towards the apprehension of the principle of responsibility through which scientific and human work can be accompanied and with which human beings can have a better awareness of their freedom in order to consider the long-term consequences that actions may have and that serve as an essential element to ensure permanence on earth and the flourishing of the human and the vindication with the planet regarding the importance of leaving it in habitable conditions for future generations. Finally, adjusted to a qualitative approach, it seeks to understand the fundamental elements of this proposal such as the new categorical imperative and the principle of responsibility, adjusting these ideas to a view that allows updating this proposal with the importance of an environmental ethics based on the idea of Aristotelian virtue and the ideal of Spaudaios that is required for the experience of it.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Environmental ethics based on Hans Jonas’ principle of responsibility (A. F. Sanmartín Sanmartín, L. F. Garcés Giraldo, C. de J. Giraldo Zuluaga, & E. A. Rodríguez Flores, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 6(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.70102/mzsfp736

References

1. Aponte, C. (2016). Ethics, Global Warming and Health: Part I. INHRR. 47(1).136-142. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-04772016000100010

2. ARISTOTLE. (1987a). About generation and corruption. (Trans. Ernesto La Croce). Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

3. ARISTOTLE. (1987b). Short treatises on natural history. (Trans. Ernesto La Croce). Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

4. ARISTOTLE. (2018). Nicomachean Ethics. (Trans. María Araujo and Julian Marías). Madrid: Ed. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

5. ARISTOTLE. (2011a). Eudemia Ethics. (Trans. Julio Pallí Bonet). Barcelona: Ed. Gredos.

6. ARISTOTLE. (2011b). Magna Moralia. (Trans. Teresa Martínez Manzano). Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

7. ARISTOTLE. (2011c). Poetics. (Trans. Teresa Martínez Manzano). Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

8. ARISTOTLE. (2007). Metaphysics. Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

9. ARISTOTLE. (2008). Politics. Madrid: Ed. Gredos.

10. National Constituent Assembly. (1991). Political Constitution of 1991. Bogotá: Ed. TEMIS.

11. Burgui, B. M. (2015). Hans Jonas: conservation of nature, conservation of life. Bioethics Notebooks. XXVI. http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2015/26/87/253.pdf

12. Camacho, V. D., & Chávez, R. B. (2023). The biocentric theory as a protective foundation of nature in economic activity. Law Review. (39). 7-23. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/900/90075141002/html/

13. FAO. (1996). What is the environment? In: https://www.fao.org/4/w1309s/w1309s09.htm

14. Gadamer, H. G. (1998). Truth and Method II. Salamanca: Ed. Follow me.

15. Garcés, G. L., & Giraldo, Z. C. (2014). Ethical virtues in Aristotle: reason for desires and their actions to achieve them. Virtual Magazine. Universidad Católica del Norte, 41, 70-78. http://revistavirtual.ucn.edu.co/index.php/RevistaUCN/article/view/466/988

16. Garcés, G. L. (2015). Aristotelian virtue as a path to human excellence and the actions to achieve it. Philosophical Discussions. Year 16. (27). 127 – 146. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/difil/v16n27/v16n27a08.pdf

17. Hernández, S., Fernández, C., & Baptista, L. (2014). Research methodology. Mexico. Ed. McGraw-Hill.

18. Jonas, H. (1995). The principle of responsibility. Barcelona: Ed. Herder

19. Jonas, H. (2000). The Life Principle: Towards a Philosophical Biology. Madrid: Ed. Trotta

20. Marcos, A. (2018). Sustainable happiness. Sustainable human development and the Aristotelian theory of happiness. http://www.fyl.uva.es/~wfilosof/webMarcos/textos/Textos2019/Alcala.pdf

21. Martínez, B. J. (2016). Aristotelian ethics and technological civilization. Philosophia. Journal of Philosophy. 76(2). 65-81. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/6039/603966971004.pdf

22. UN. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. In: https://www.un.org/es/impacto-académico/page/objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible

23. Pérez, R. N., & Oviedo, Á. V. (2019). Environment, urban environment and Public Administration. University of Havana, (287), 175-184. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/uh/n287/0253-9276-uh-287-175.pdf

24. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford

25. Vargas, C. R. (2008). Elements for the consideration of an environmental ethics. Revista Espiga. (16).161-188. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4678/467847230011.pdf