Shaping environmental ethics through linguistic framing in eco-philosophy

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2025-05-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70102/z3yayv82
Keywords:
Environmental ethics, Linguistic framing, Eco-philosophy, Ecological diversity

Main Article Content

Khaitgul Muzaffarova
Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan.
Baxodir Xusanov
Namangan State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan.
Shahnoza Shomuradova
Head of the Department of Tourism, Chirchik State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan.
Gulchexra Abdulxay
Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan.
Bekpulat Turobov
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Uzbekistan.
Otabek Gaybullaev
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
Dilnoza Abdullayeva
Tashkent State Pedagogical University named after Nizami, Uzbekistan.
Maqsad Matyakubov
Urgench State University, Uzbekistan.

Abstract

Linguistic framing looks at the complex relationship between language and its environment, focusing on how environmental factors affect language's variety, structure, and growth. This study looks at the connection between linguistics and ecology from the point of view of linguistic framing, looking at how changing conditions affect language use, shift, and loss. The study used an integrated approach that combined linguistic, anthropological, and biological views to show that language is deeply connected to its surroundings. Information from indigenous groups, languages dying out, and language areas stresses how different languages are connected in Eco-Philosophy. The results show that losing spoken languages is linked to environmental damage. To protect both, efforts to keep languages alive should be combined with measures to protect the environment. The study looks at how language affects how people see nature and how different languages show how people have adapted to their surroundings. Because global warming and globalization pose long-term risks, it is essential to have a unified plan for language and sustainability to protect biological and cultural diversity.

Article Details

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 1 (January-June), 2025

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shaping environmental ethics through linguistic framing in eco-philosophy (K. Muzaffarova, B. Xusanov, S. Shomuradova, G. Abdulxay, B. Turobov, O. Gaybullaev, D. Abdullayeva, & M. Matyakubov, Trans.). (2025). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 5(1), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.70102/z3yayv82

References

Arellano, M.D.P.C., Castro, M.D.P.Q., Mondragón, E.M.B., Valdivieso, M.O.M., Gonzáles, J.R.C., and Castro, G.A.Q., 2024. Examining Face Recognition Technologies and Privacy: Ethical and Legal Choices. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 14(4), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2024.I4.022

Banerjee, P. and Sowards, S.K., 2022. Working across languages/cultures in international and environmental communication fieldwork. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), pp.36-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1850844

Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., Skirgård, H., Ritchie, A., Cardillo, M., Meakins, F., Greenhill, S. and Hua, X., 2022. Global predictors of language endangerment and the future of linguistic diversity. Nature ecology & evolution, 6(2), pp.163-173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01604-y

Ganesan, A., Sethuraman, P. and Balamurugan, S., 2024. The Impact of Geology on Environmental Management in Mining Operations.

Archives for Technical Sciences, 2(31), pp.86-93. https://doi.org/10.7 0102/afts.2024.1631.086

Gilbert, J., Soliev, I., Robertson, A., Vermeylen, S., Williams, N.W. and Grabowski, R.C., 2023. Understanding the rights of nature: working together across and beyond disciplines. Human Ecology, 51(3), pp.363-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10745-023-00420-1

Gontier, N., 2022. Defining communication and language from within a pluralistic evolutionary worldview. Topoi, 41(3), pp.609-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09811-3

Guo, Z., Ramli, M.F., and Cui, R., 2024. Image Recognition of New Year Pictures based on Machine Learning. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 15(3), pp.543-557. https://doi.org/10.58346/ JOWUA.2024.I3.034

Hategan, V.P., 2021. Eco trends, counseling and applied ecology in community using Sophia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), p.6572. https://doi.or g/10.3390/ijerph18126572

Hategan, V.P., 2021. Promoting the eco-dialogue through eco-philosophy for community. Sustainability, 13(8), p.4291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084291

Khodjaev, N., Boymuradov, S., Jalolova, S., Zhaparkulov, A., Dostova, S., Muhammadiyev, F., Abdullayeva, C., and Zokirov, K., 2024. Assessing the effectiveness of aquatic education program in promoting environmental awareness among school children. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 4(S1), pp.33-38. https://doi.org/10.70102/IJARES/ V4S1/6

Kubayev U., Toshalieva S., Ayubov I., Haydarovna R.D., Erkinjon T. 2024. Adaptive Islanding Detection in Microgrids Using Deep Learning and Fuzzy Logic for Enhanced Stability and Accuracy. Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering, 12, Special Issue, pp.1–10.

Mehra, A., and Iyer, R., 2024. Youth Entrepreneurship as a Catalyst for Inclusive Economic Growth in Developing Nations. International Journal of SDG’s Prospects and Breakthroughs, 2(3), pp.13-15.

Mi, L., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, T. and Qiao, L., 2024. Knowledge mapping analysis of pro-environmental behaviors: research hotspots, trends and frontiers. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp.1-35.

Moreau, I. and Sinclair, T., 2024. A Secure Blockchain-Enabled Framework for Healthcare Record Management and Patient Data Protection. Global Journal of Medical Terminology Research and Informatics, 2(4), pp.30-36.

Nakamura, Y., and Lindholm, M., 2025. Impact of Corn Production on Agriculture and Ecological Uses of Olive Mill Sewage using Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration. Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation, 3(1), 13-17.

Oladinrin, O.T., Arif, M., Rana, M.Q. and Gyoh, L., 2023. Interrelations between construction ethics and innovation: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Construction Innovation, 23(3), pp.505-523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2021-0130

Peeples, J. and Murphy, M., 2022. Discourse and rhetorical analysis approaches to environment, media, and communication. In The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 50-62). Routledge.

Ravshanova, A., Akramova, F., Saparov, K., Yorkulov, J., Akbarova, M. and Azimov, D., 2024. Ecological-Faunistic Analysis of Helminthes of Waterbirds of the Aidar-Arnasay System of Lakes in Uzbekistan. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 9(1), pp.10-25. https://doi. org/10.28978/nesciences.1471270

Reddy, N. and Qureshi, I., 2024. Human Reproductive Strategies and Socio-ecological Contexts: An Evolutionary Approach. Progression journal of Human Demography and Anthropology, 2(2), pp.5-8.

Tunga, S.K., 2021. Lotka’s Law and Author Productivity in the Economic Literature: A Citation Study. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 11(2), pp.1-8. https://doi.or g/10.51983/ijiss-2021.11.2.2998

Zhou, S., Nijhuis, S. and Dijkstra, R., 2024. Towards a pattern language for green space design in high density urban developments. Journal of Urban Design, 29(5), pp.576-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2023.2300505