Sarcopenia in the Shadows: Feasibility of Screening Postmenopausal Women Using the SARC-F Questionnaire and Gait Speed Test in a Menopause Clinic

Main Article Content

Dr. Samyuktha B S1
Dr. Rajalekshmi M

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a progressive, age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass and function that contributes to frailty, falls, and loss of independence. Postmenopausal women represent a vulnerable group, yet sarcopenia remains under-recognised in gynecology and menopause clinics, where routine screening is seldom performed. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of screening for sarcopenia among postmenopausal women attending a menopause clinic using the SARC-F questionnaire and gait speed testing, and to estimate the proportion of women screening positive. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted among postmenopausal women aged 45–70 years attending a menopause clinic at a tertiary care teaching hospital between August 2024 and January 2025. Screening was performed using the SARC-F questionnaire (score ≥4 indicating probable sarcopenia) and a 6-meter gait speed test, with the middle 4 meters timed. A gait speed of ≤0.8 m/s was considered indicative of poor physical performance, in accordance with the EWGSOP2 framework. Feasibility outcomes included time required for screening and acceptance by participants and clinic staff. Results: A total of 50 postmenopausal women were screened. Twelve women (24%) had a SARC-F score ≥4, while eight women (16%) demonstrated a gait speed ≤0.8 m/s. Overall, 20 women (40%) screened positive on either SARC-F or gait speed testing, indicating a substantial hidden burden of probable sarcopenia. Screening was highly feasible, requiring less than five minutes per participant, with a 100% acceptance rate among both patients and clinic staff. Increasing age and lower physical activity levels were more frequently observed among women who screened positive. Conclusion Screening for sarcopenia using the SARC-F questionnaire and gait speed test is quick, feasible, and well accepted in a menopause clinic setting. Incorporating simple functional screening tools into routine menopause care may facilitate early identification of sarcopenia and enable timely preventive interventions in postmenopausal women.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sarcopenia in the Shadows: Feasibility of Screening Postmenopausal Women Using the SARC-F Questionnaire and Gait Speed Test in a Menopause Clinic (S. B S & R. M, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.70102/2wwz2754

References

1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

2. Santilli V, Bernetti A, Mangone M, et al. Clinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014;11:177–180.

3. Maltais ML, Desroches J, Dionne IJ. Changes in muscle mass and strength after menopause. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009;9:186–197.

4. Greising SM, Baltgalvis KA, Lowe DA, Warren GL. Hormone therapy and skeletal muscle strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:76–83.

5. Clynes MA, Gregson CL, Bruyère O, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Osteosarcopenia. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:343–358.

6. McLeod M, Breen L, Hamilton DL, Philp A. Live strong and prosper: the importance of skeletal muscle strength. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1225–1231.

7. Malmstrom TK, Morley JE. SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14:531–532.

8. Woo J, Leung J, Morley JE. Validating the SARC-F. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:630–634.

9. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305:50–58.

10. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, et al. Prognostic value of usual gait speed. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1675–1680.

11. Sharma AA, Kumari S, Sharma NK, et al. Evaluation of the SARC-F questionnaire as a diagnostic tool for sarcopenia in geriatric age-group in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024;72(6):27–32.

12. Beaudart C, Locquet M, Bornheim S, et al. French translation and validation of the SARC-F. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9:29–37.

13. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–561.

14. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, et al. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by BIA. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:465–471.

15. Parra-Rodríguez L, Szlejf C, García-González AI, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of SARC-F. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1142–1146.

16. Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass. Sports Med. 2011;41:59–68.

17. Liao CD, Tsauo JY, Wu YT, et al. Effects of protein supplementation combined with exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1078–1091.

18. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Staehelin HB, et al. Fall prevention with vitamin D. JAMA. 2004;291:1999–2006.

19. Shaikh N, Harshitha R, Bhargava M. Prevalence of sarcopenia in rural South India. F1000Res. 2020.

20. Rahman R, Wilson BP, Paul TV, et al. Prevalence and factors contributing to sarcopenia in older Indians. Aging Med. 2021;4:257–265.