Aquatic ecology-based conservation discourses in philology education for language and environmental literacy

Main Article Content

Abdukarim Musaev
Dilafruz Toirova
Moxichexraxon Mamatxonova
Madina Madieva
Khusnurakhon Kosimova
Alisher Ernazarov
Gulmehra Chinkulova
Zulxumor Bannopova

Abstract

The ecological crisis, which is slowly growing in freshwater and coastal ecosystems, has heightened the need for interdisciplinary teaching strategies that integrate environmental science with the humanities. However, philology training does not necessarily relate to ecological facts, limiting students' environmental literacy and criticality toward the environmental conservation discourses implicit in language and literature. This paper explores how conservation discourses grounded in aquatic ecology can be integrated into philology language curricula to improve linguistic competence and environmental knowledge. A quantitative and qualitative design was selected to target 48 undergraduate students and 4 faculty members within a curriculum-based case study. These included eco-critical analysis of texts, discourse mapping of water issues in classical and modern literature, and project-based learning focused on local water bodies. Environmental literacy, discourse analysis ability, and conservation attitudes were evaluated using pre-intervention and post-intervention tests, with standardized rubrics used to assess the intervention's impact and a Likert scale used to assess the intervention's impact. Findings also showed a 34% increase in environmental literacy (52.3 to 70.1), a 28% boost in analytical language proficiency, and a 41% increase in student participation in community-based conservation dialogues. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the data, with a significant difference at p < 0.01. Qualitative responses also demonstrated the improved interpretive qualities of ecological accounts and greater attachment to water ecology. The results show that incorporating the discourses of aquatic ecology into philological studies not only enhances linguistic proficiency but also fosters responsible environmental citizenship. The study concludes that the interdisciplinary curriculum model may play an objectively important role in ensuring sustainable literacy practices and, in the long run, in developing conservation-oriented views among students in the humanities.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Aquatic ecology-based conservation discourses in philology education for language and environmental literacy (A. Musaev, D. Toirova, M. Mamatxonova, M. Madieva, K. Kosimova, A. Ernazarov, G. Chinkulova, & Z. Bannopova, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 6(1), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.70102/t0146w67

References

Achadiyah, R., 2025. Promoting ecological critical awareness through English Language Teaching: EFL Teachers’ strategies and practices. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v10i2.15514

Alter, G., 2024. Communicating In and About the Ocean through SCUBA Interaction and Ocean Picturebooks. Ecological Communication and Ecoliteracy, p.217.

Ashraf, R., Arslan, M.F. and Murtaza, K., 2025. The power of language: Role of eco-linguistics in shaping environmental awareness. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(1), pp.1785-1792. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.1.142

Ananda, M.G., 2026. An Eco-Linguistic Analysis of Sri Lankan School English Textbooks: Examining Environmental Discourse and Language Use. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 19(05), pp.23-34. https://doi.org/10.64211/oidaijsd190502

Alsalihi, H.D., 2025. Eco-Linguistics in Actions: Using Environmental Themes to Foster English Language Skills Through Contextual Learning in High Schools. Kufa Journal of Arts, 1, pp.397-428. https://doi.org/10.36317/kja/2025/v1.i65.19285

Cristovão, V.L.L., Sanches, B. and Smart, G., 2022. Environmental discourse in Brazilian English-as-a-foreign-language textbooks: socio-discursive practices and their implications for developing students’ critical environmental literacy. Environmental Education Research, 28(1), pp.75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2007855

Curdt-Christiansen, X.L., 2021. Environmental literacy: raising awareness through Chinese primary education textbooks. Language, culture and curriculum, 34(2), pp.147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797078

Guerrero, G. and Sjöström, J., 2025. Critical scientific and environmental literacies: a systematic and critical review. Studies in Science Education, 61(1), pp.41-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2344988

Kazazoglu, S., 2025. Environmental education through eco-literacy: Integrating sustainability into English language teaching. Sustainability, 17(5), p.2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052156

Lee, D.B. and Nguyen, T.H.N., 2024. The treatment of environmental literacy in the ELT textbooks in Vietnam. Cogent Education, 11(1), p.2425898. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2425898

Lisberg Jensen, E., 2025. “The name of things”: Lexical ecological literacy as Bildung in environmental and sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2025.2541885

Ma, J. (2024). Promoting the formation of environmental awareness in children: the representation of nature in Chinese language textbooks. Journal of World Languages, 10(2), 456-485. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0024

Minyar-Beloroucheva, A. and Sergienko, P., 2021. The language of ecology within the frame of public relations discourse. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 14, pp.147-154. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2021.14.016

Ngurah Parthama, I.G., Kade Yuliani Giri, N.L. and Alit Ida Setianingsih, N.K., 2025. Language and Ecology in the Classroom: A Study of Environmental Discourse in Balinese Primary School Textbooks. Linguistika: Buletin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/ling.2025.v32.i01.p09

Tatin, I.A.G., Triyono, S., Jacobs, G.M., Trett, S., Bangsa, A.A.S. and Zhu, C., 2024. An Analysis of Environmental Education in Indonesian EFL Elementary School Textbooks. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(3), pp.3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.3p.3

Triyono, S., Sahayu, W. and Fath, S.N., 2023. Ecological discourse and environmental education in English textbooks: A multimodal eco-critical discourse analysis. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(3), pp.213-227. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2903-15

Wood, M.M., Mileti, D.S., Kano, M., Kelley, M.M., Regan, R. and Bourque, L.B., 2012. Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards⋆. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(4), pp.601-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x

Williams, C., 2018. Brueggemann, the land and the forest: a Forest Church perspective on the theology of the land. Practical theology, 11(5), pp.462-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2018.1536350

Yuang, C.H.E.N. and Yong-bi, Z., 2024. Ecological discourse analysis based on the corpus: A case study on the environmental discourse of 21st Century. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 14(8), pp.693-702. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2024.08.007