Wildfire Impacts on Subterranean Faunal Communities: Multi-Trophic Responses and Biodiversity Loss across a Heterogeneous Landscape of Muniya Conservation Reserve, Central India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Wildfires are frequent disruptions of tropical dry deciduous forests and have a significant impact on belowground ecosystems that lead to soil functionality and ecological stability. The multi-trophic soil fauna communities are self-governing systems regulating decomposition and nutrient cycling and biological interactions, but their trophic-level wildfire responses are poorly characterized in systematically heterogeneous tropical landscapes. This report looks into the impact of wildfire on subterranean fauna, especially multi-trophic reactions and biodiversity reduction within differing landscape units of the Muniya Conservation reserve, central India. Soil sample field-based and controlled laboratory studies were carried out in burnt and unburnt sites in grasslands, scrub vegetation and thick forests. The fauna of the soil was categorised into major trophic groups, and the abundance, biomass, trophic structure, activity, and biodiversity measured with the split-plot experimental design, supplemented by additional statistical tests. Findings have shown that wildfire has a major effect on the organization of the subsurface food-web leading to disproportionate losses at upper trophic levels and simplification of the community structure. The most sensitive to fire disturbance were the predatory and functionally specialized groups with relative moderate persistence in lower trophic groups. The indexes of biodiversity decreased steadily in the burnt states indicating homogenization of communities and lack of functional redundancy. Despite the fact that the extent of impacts varied with the landscape heterogeneity, wildfire became the major cause of trophic imbalance and biodiversity loss, regardless of the habitat type. Such results indicate that wildfire transforms the complex soil faunal communities to simplified and functionally weak systems, and long-term impacts of wildfires on soil process and ecosystem resiliency may be severe.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Box, G. E. P., & Jones, S. 1992. Split-plot designs for robust product experimentation. Journal of Applied Statistics, 19(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769200000001
2. Dudgeon, D., & Strayer, D. L. 2025. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: What are the prospects? Biological Reviews, 100(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13137
3. Ercanli, İ., & Kahriman, A. 2015. The evaluation of different forest structural indices to predict the stand aboveground biomass of even-aged Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in Kunduz, Northern Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4248-x
4. Fahrig, L., Baudry, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F. G., Crist, T. O., Fuller, R. J., Sirami, C., Siriwardena, G. M., & Martin, J.-L. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology Letters, 14(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x
5. Fioratti Junca, M., Reid, B. J., Sims, I., & Miller, A. J. 2023. Below-ground pitfall traps for standardised monitoring of soil mesofauna: Design and comparison to Berlese/Tullgren funnels. Pedobiologia, 101, 150911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150911
6. Gómez-Rey, M. X., Couto-Vázquez, A., García-Marco, S., & González-Prieto, S. J. 2013. Impact of fire and post-fire management techniques on soil chemical properties. Geoderma, 195–196, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.005
7. Joshi, R. K., & Dhyani, S. 2019. Biomass, carbon density and diversity of tree species in tropical dry deciduous forests in Central India. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2018.09.009
8. Khattak, W. A., Anas, M., Hakki, E. E., & Fahad, S. 2026. Cyanobacterial bloom impacts on aquatic food webs and ecosystem services. In S. Fahad, S. Saud, J. Song, T. Nawaz, & R. Zhou (Eds.), Cyanobacterial blooms: Ecology, evolution and biogeochemical impacts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06042-6_10
9. McKenzie, D. 2020. Ecological disturbance. In Mountains in the greenhouse. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42432-9_6
10. Muenchow, J., Dieker, P., Kluge, J., et al. 2018. A review of ecological gradient research in the tropics: Identifying research gaps, future directions, and conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1465-y
11. Muir, E. J., Gemmell, B. J., & Kramer, A. M. 2025. Captive rearing reduces the sensitivity of Acartia tonsa copepods to predator cues. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 584, 152091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2025.152091
12. Pérez-Roig, C., Videla, M., El Mujtar, V., Moreno, M. L., Cardozo, A., & Tittonell, P. A. 2026. Soil fauna responses to land-use change are size-dependent and linked to soil compaction and organic matter. Applied Soil Ecology, 219, 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.106794
13. Rau, B. M., Chambers, J. C., Blank, R. R., & Johnson, D. W. 2008. Prescribed fire, soil, and plants: Burn effects and interactions in the central Great Basin. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 61(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.2111/07-037.1
14. Scheu, S. (2002). The soil food web: Structure and perspectives. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01117-7
15. Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Dormann, C. F., et al. 2012. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes: Eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews, 87(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
16. Wardle, D. A., Yeates, G. W., Williamson, W., & Bonner, K. I. 2003. The response of a three trophic level soil food web to the identity and diversity of plant species and functional groups. Oikos, 102(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12481.x
17. Yin, X., Song, B., Dong, W., et al. 2010. A review on the eco-geography of soil fauna in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-010-0333-4