The Strategic Evolution of DuPont Analysis in Dominant Technology Firms: An Empirical Longitudinal Study of the "Magnificent Seven" (2014-2024)

Main Article Content

Jorge A. Restrepo Morales I.U
David Alberto García Arango
Luis Fernando Garcés Giraldo
Carlos Guillermo Vargas Febres
Massila kamalrudin
Xochitl Berenise Gonzáles Torres

Abstract

The "Magnificent Seven" technology firms exert unprecedented influence on global markets, yet a significant gap exists in understanding the fundamental drivers of their heterogeneous financial performance. This study addresses this gap by systematically analyzing the evolution of their value-creation strategies through a comprehensive DuPont analysis framework. We conducted a longitudinal DuPont analysis, decomposing Return on Equity (ROE) for the seven firms over the 2014-2024 period. The analysis utilizes a panel dataset of 73 firm-year observations and is estimated using fixed-effects econometric models with macroeconomic controls to isolate the impact of net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. Critically, we address methodological concerns by implementing robust standard errors to correct for heteroscedasticity, ensuring valid statistical inference. Our findings reveal fundamentally divergent strategic paths. NVIDIA's ROE transformation exemplifies technology-driven margin expansion, while Apple achieved exceptional performance primarily through sophisticated financial engineering. Amazon's consistently modest ROE reflects its deliberate long-term reinvestment strategy. The corrected econometric analysis confirms that Net Profit Margin (β = 1.076, robust p < 0.001) and Equity Multiplier (β = 11.317, robust p < 0.001) are the primary drivers of ROE variation, while Asset Turnover remains statistically insignificant This study provides the first robust, longitudinal evidence of strategic heterogeneity in value creation among elite technology firms, offering a methodologically sound framework for assessing the sources and sustainability of corporate profitability in the digital economy.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Strategic Evolution of DuPont Analysis in Dominant Technology Firms: An Empirical Longitudinal Study of the "Magnificent Seven" (2014-2024) (J. A. R. Morales I.U, D. A. García Arango, L. F. Garcés Giraldo, C. G. Vargas Febres, M. kamalrudin, & X. B. Gonzáles Torres, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 6(S1), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.70102/2d58pj79

References

1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. The Free Press.

2. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23-48.

3. Cennamo, C. (2021). Competing in digital platform ecosystems: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Management, 47(8), 1809-1818.

4. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.

5. Fairfield, P. M., & Yohn, T. L. (2001). Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(4), 371-385.

6. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

7. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.

8. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.

9. Kothari, S. P., Laguerre, T. E., & Leone, A. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-3), 89-122.

10. Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. John Wiley & Sons.

11. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.

12. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.

13. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.

14. Nissim, D., & Penman, S. H. (2001). Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(1), 109-154.

15. Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.

16. Peters, R. H., & Taylor, L. A. (2017). Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 251-272.

17. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185.

18. Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 823-853.

19. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Doubleday/Currency.

20. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

21. Tirole, J. (2017). Economics for the common good. Princeton University Press.

22. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838.

23. Wooldridge, J. M. (2020). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.