Cost-benefit analysis of integrated aquaponics systems for culturing high-value species

Main Article Content

Archana Uday Kashid
Deepak Kumar Swain
Dr. Narendrakumar J. Suryavanshi
Sunil Kumar Mishra
Dr. Anandbabu Rangasamy
Sahil Suri
Akash Kumar Bhagat
Dr. Gargi Shekhar

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the economic feasibility of the Integrated Aquaponics Systems (IAS) of high-value species such as tilapia and shrimp in comparison with the normal farming and aquaculture systems. The approach to it was a detailed cost-benefit analysis (CBA), which included the data on infrastructure, costs of operations, yield rates, and market prices. A sensitivity analysis was also incorporated in the analysis in order to determine the effects of variations in the most important variables on the financial performance of IAS, and these variables include fish yield and market demand. The findings showed that IAS registered the highest ROI of 120, and this was far better than the 66.7% ROI in conventional farming and 87.5% ROI in aquaculture systems. The payback period of IAS took the least time of 2.5 years compared to 3 years of farming and 2.7 years of aquaculture. The sensitivity analysis showed that the most important variables in profitability were fish yield and market prices, and a 10% change in the former brought about significant changes in revenue. Although it had a higher initial capital requirement, IAS was more resource-efficient because it was showing long-term sustainability and profitability. To sum up, IAS showed better economic results compared to traditional systems, which outlines its ability to be a sustainable and profitable farming system. The future development of IAS should be dedicated to increasing its scalability through decreasing initial expenses, optimizing system components, and searching for technological evolution that would be able to enhance the financial results under different market conditions. The issue of the effects of regulatory frameworks on the popularity of IAS should also be examined further.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cost-benefit analysis of integrated aquaponics systems for culturing high-value species (A. Uday Kashid, D. Kumar Swain, N. J. Suryavanshi, S. K. Mishra, A. Rangasamy, S. Suri, A. K. Bhagat, & G. Shekhar, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 6(1), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.70102/eyh6ww17

References

Baganz, G. F., Junge, R., Portella, M. C., Goddek, S., Keesman, K. J., Baganz, D., Staaks, G., Shaw, C., Lohrberg, F., & Kloas, W. (2022). The aquaponic principle—It is all about coupling. *Reviews in Aquaculture, 14*(1), 252–264. [https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12596](https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12596)

Basumatary, B., Verma, A. K., & Verma, M. K. (2023). Global research trends on aquaponics: A systematic review based on computational mapping. *Aquaculture International, 31*(2), 1115–1141. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-01018-y](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-01018-y)

Begam, G. S., & Banu, W. A. (2025). Recommendations for using transparent deep learning in aquaponics to detect nutrient deficiencies using CNN and Grad-CAM. *Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 16*(1), 258–268. [https://doi.org/10.58346/JOWUA.2025.I1.016](https://doi.org/10.58346/JOWUA.2025.I1.016)

Buzby, K. M., Waterland, N. L., Semmens, K. J., & Lin, L. S. (2016). Evaluating aquaponic crops in a freshwater flow-through fish culture system. *Aquaculture, 460*, 15–24. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.046)

Colt, J., Schuur, A. M., Weaver, D., & Semmens, K. (2022). Engineering design of aquaponics systems. *Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 30*(1), 33–80. [https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2021.1886240](https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2021.1886240)

Ibrahim, L. A., Shaghaleh, H., El-Kassar, G. M., Abu-Hashim, M., Elsadek, E. A., & Alhaj Hamoud, Y. (2023). Aquaponics: A sustainable path to food sovereignty and enhanced water use efficiency. *Water, 15*(24), 4310. [https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244310](https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244310)

Khater, E. G., Bahnasawy, A., Afify, M., & El-Habbaq, M. (2024). Technical and economical evaluation of the integration aquaculture system and lettuce plants production. *Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 23*(3), 1–23. [https://doi.org/10.21608/jaesj.2024.333972.1207](https://doi.org/10.21608/jaesj.2024.333972.1207)

Muthu, N., & Sathiyamurthy, A. (2025). Evaluating soil and sediment quality in coastal regions for sustainable aquaculture development. *Natural and Engineering Sciences, 10*(2), 393–401. [https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1714427](https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1714427)

Nakamura, Y., & Lindholm, M. (2025). Impact of corn production on agriculture and ecological uses of olive mill sewage using ultrafiltration and microfiltration. *Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation, 3*(1), 13–17.

Okomoda, V. T., Oladimeji, S. A., Solomon, S. G., Olufeagba, S. O., Ogah, S. I., & Ikhwanuddin, M. (2023). Aquaponics production system: A review of historical perspective, opportunities, and challenges of its adoption. *Food Science & Nutrition, 11*(3), 1157–1165. [https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3154](https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3154)

Petropoulos, N., & Lefèvre, M. (2025). Development of integrated recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) for sustainable inland fish farming. *Aquatic Ecosystems and Environmental Frontiers, 3*(3), 11–15. [https://doi.org/10.70102/AEEF/V3I3/3](https://doi.org/10.70102/AEEF/V3I3/3)

Sethi, K., & Jain, R. (2024). Smart grid technologies and renewable integration: Contributions to the periodic series in electrical and environmental innovation. In *Smart Grid Integration* (pp. 26–32). *Periodic Series in Multidisciplinary Studies*.

Shimazu, S. (2024). Intelligent, sustainable supply chain management: A configurational strategy to improve ecological sustainability through digitization. *Global Perspectives in Management, 2*(3), 44–53.

Waltersmann, L., Kiemel, S., Stuhlsatz, J., Sauer, A., & Miehe, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications for increasing resource efficiency in manufacturing companies: A comprehensive review. *Sustainability, 13*(12), 6689. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126689](https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126689)

Zamnuri, M. A. H. B., Qiu, S., Rizalmy, M. A. A. B., He, W., Yusoff, S., Roeroe, K. A., Du, J., & Loh, K. H. (2024). Integration of IoT in small-scale aquaponics to enhance efficiency and profitability: A systematic review. *Animals, 14*(17), 2555. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172555](https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172555)