The effect of agricultural runoff on freshwater biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nutrient runoff from agricultural operations threatens aquatic health and can have enduring and intricate consequences for the environment, ecological systems, and human populations. A comprehensive quantitative study of the literature was performed to identify various Nutrient Runoff Mitigation Systems (NR-MS) employed worldwide to avoid or repair environmental harm caused by excessive agricultural fertilization. Practical information on results from multiple NR-MS in the examined research was utilized to assess the methods based on ecological advantages, implementation costs, and feasibility. A comprehensive evaluation of the viability of NR-MS was conducted, along with a macro-level analysis of the obstacles hindering its widespread deployment. Recognized research deficiencies encompassed a scarcity of literature addressing nutrient runoff reduction, skepticism among farmers regarding voluntary policy adoption without significant incentives, and an overall absence of cost/benefit analyses, such as insights into the uncertainties related to NR-MS that could guide decision-makers in formulating successful and effective methods for various site conditions. The combination of review information enabled the creation of a complete decision-making structure to govern nutrient runoff, addressing current constraints and offering local NR-MS suggestions for regulators to adopt.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
AbuQamar, S.F., El-Saadony, M.T., Alkafaas, S.S.,Elsalahaty,M.I., Elkafas, S.S., Mathew, B.T. and El-Tarabily, K.A., 2024. Ecological impacts and management strategies of pesticide pollution on aquatic life and human beings. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 206, p.116613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2 024.116613.
Ahmed, S.F., Kumar, P.S., Kabir, M., Zuhara, F.T., Mehjabin, A., Tasannum, N. and Mofijur, M., 2022. Threats, challenges, and sustainable conservation strategies for freshwater biodiversity. Environmental Research, 214, p.113808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envres.2022.113808
Akyol, O., Çoker, T., Toprak, H.B. and Capapé, C., 2023. Capture of a rare smoothback angelshark Squatina oculata (Squatinidae) in Turkish waters, with updated records from the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 8(1), pp.38–45.
http://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.12 81611
Alipour, A., Hashemi, S.M., Shokri,
S.B.S. and Sadeghi, S.H., 2016. Evaluating the water quality in the agriculture part of the Hamoun Hirmand basin. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 3(2), pp.80–86.
Dudgeon, D. and Strayer, D.L., 2025. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: What are the prospects? Biological Reviews, 100(1), pp.205–226.
https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13137
Jackson, M.C., Pawar, S. and Woodward, G., 2021. The temporal dynamics of multiple stressor effects: From individuals to ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(5), pp.402–410.
Lan, J., Liu, P., Hu, X. and Zhu, S., 2024. Harmful algal blooms in eutrophic marine environments: Causes, monitoring, and treatment. Water, 16(17), p.2525.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172525
Lima, M., Firmino, V.C., de Paiva, C.K.S., Juen, L. and Brasil, L.S., 2022. Land use changes disrupt streams and affect the functional feeding groups of aquatic insects in the Amazon. Journal of Insect Conservation, 26(2), pp.137–148.
López-Carr, D., 2021. A review of small farmer land use and deforestation in tropical forest frontiers: Implications for conservation and sustainable livelihoods. Land, 10(11), p.1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111113
Ogidi, O.I. and Akpan, U.M., 2022. Aquatic biodiversity loss: Impacts of pollution and anthropogenic activities and strategies for conservation. In: Biodiversity in Africa: Potentials, Threats and Conservation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp.421–448.
Pohn, D. and Hommel, W., 2021. Universal identity and access management framework for future ecosystems. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 12(1), pp.64–84.
Raja, T. and Ravi Kumar Kennedy, I., 2019. Initiating the ecosystem in college libraries: An overview. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 9(S1), pp.16–18. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2019.9. S1.573
S, A., Spoorthi, T.D., Sunil, and Kurian, M.Z., 2021. Implementation of LoRa-based autonomous agriculture robot. International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies, 9(1), pp.34–39.
Tiwari, A.K. and Pal, D.B., 2022. Nutrient contamination and eutrophication in the river ecosystem. In: Ecological Significance of River Ecosystems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.203–216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85045-2.00001-7
Weisner, O., Frische, T., Liebmann, L., Reemtsma, T., Roß-Nickoll, M., Schäfer, R.B. and Liess, M., 2021. Risk from pesticide mixtures – The gap between risk assessment and reality. Science of the Total Environment, 796, p.149017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.20 21.149017